What is our network designed to do? Our network is design to help students' search on Pcomp web site easier. Why do so many ITP students buy the Physical Computing Book even though Tom Igoe's web site is more comprehensive? There are varieties of reasons, but the assumption is convenience; the narrative nature of the book allows for the reader to feel comfortable in the story of chapters and the ease of the index. If you already know a specific word, just google the word + tigoe.net. You will find needed information without any problems. Tom is often updating his web site and offering detailed information with easy-to-understand documents. But if you hardly know/remember the term, tough luck! You land up spending precious time looking though his site for the required information! For your information, there are 829 pages under Tom's "pcomp" folder. Without archives, there are still 109 pages. Additionally, those pages are sorted into "Intro to Physical Computing", "Sensor Workshop", "PhysComp Notes", "Resources", "Code" and so on. On the other hand, you can find information through the book even if you don't exactly know or remember the word. When you are not sure of the term while knowing it belongs to the general category of sensors, all you do is look up the index. Since there is a section named "sensor", you will find the page by reading through those names. Furthermore, you can gain a whole other angle of inspiration by the pages you flip through to when you are trying to get to what you want. Also if you have no idea of subject matter such as "video tracking" the expansive chapter on it does a great job encouraging you into it vs. the intimidating overwhelming set of "google" links. So here not only do your develop a knowledge on video tracking but delve deeper into "Sensing movement." Though, you will not get any latest information, such as "arduino". So, our idea is combining those great aspects of web site and book without asking Tom for extra work. By adding tags to Pcomp site by students, we would like to create self-generated index. For first step, we are using del.icio.us to add those tags, but as a future plan we are thinking to have the interface like below.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Basic description of our network's characteristics + Network's explanation Each element of our network is like this;
|
||||||||||||||||||
Visual Explanation
|
||||||||||||||||||
Prediction
|
||||||||||||||||||
How it worked actually? On December 3, we send an email to invite people to add tags together on Sunday 6:30 to 7:00 at Japanese room. About 10 people helped us. Here is the instruction document, which we gave to them.
Also, we send an another email to the list to ask for tagging by themselves.
So, our observation is;
|
||||||||||||||||||
Future plan At this point, we are showing students only the del.icio.us interface. Yet we think this interface could be more user-friendly for our purpose. Here is an idea of our new interface designed by Takashi Mizohata.
Also, the new extension for del.icio.us + FireFox would be interesting as a reference;
At this point, we hardly know if tagging on one specific web site with many students works as a glossary page or not. But through this project, I found that it may have a huge possibility of new way of "index page" for web sites. |